Let’s
keep it simple, ‘It’s the robbery, stupid’
If
the government allowed councils nationally to keep their tenants’
rents, the gaping shortfall in the finances needed for management,
maintenance and long term repairs to council homes, now standing
at £2,250 million, would be reduced by almost two thirds.
The shortfall is almost three times the size of the Government’s
widely publicised ‘Decent Homes’ programme.
The
most authoritative Government commissioned analysis of what management
and maintenance (M&M) allowances should be was carried out by
the Building Research Establishment – (www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing
/estimation). Their findings show that M&M allowances are now
about £1,300 million too low.
Additionally,
the results of the modelling of repair needs over 30 years in six
localities published by CLG in March this year show that the Major
Repairs Allowance (MRA) is 43% below the level needed (Inside Housing
14.03.08) – a further £950m a year.
Despite
this huge shortfall, the Treasury is making a profit on council
housing. This profit breaks a promise made by an ex Housing Minister,
Hilary Armstrong, (after tenants found out that the Treasury had
its fingers in the ‘HRA till’ to fund housing benefit),
that the Treasury would not ‘again’ divert tenants rents
outside the national HRA.
The
£194 million surplus revealed in Inside Housing (10.01.08)
is the tip of the iceberg; before taking into account the clearly
unfair use of tenants rents to cover debt charges, when almost all
of the capital receipts from the sale of council housing are never
seen again so far as investment in council tenants’ homes
are concerned.
We
call this ‘Moonlight Robbery’ because tenants’
rents (£1,400 million this year) are spirited away, under
the cover of a mass of figures and much talk by Ministers about
how terribly complicated HRA finances are.
The
scale of the robbery is now so audacious that more and more people
are spotting it. It has spurred Winchester tenant, Alan Rickman,
to take the Government to the European Court of Human Rights (Inside
Housing 18.04.08) and indeed most of the recent debate in parliament
on the Housing and Regeneration Bill focused on the injustice being
done to council tenants.
Faced
with rumblings CLG announced a “Review”. Disappointingly
it has been trying to focus discussion on side issues like the extent
to which the HRA system should be nationally redistributive. Who
does worst is not the key issue when everyone is being ripped off.
Everyone working in social housing would I hope back the fairer
funding objectives of the Moonlight Robbery campaign (www.moonlightrobbery.org.uk),
supported by regional tenants’ organisations and TAROE. I
trust that those working in social housing have the knowledge not
be taken in by the Government’s alibi that it is all too complicated
for them to understand what they were doing. To rephrase the statement
on a well-known poster directed at USA election campaign workers
in 1992 telling them to keep it simple, “It’s the robbery,
stupid”
Brian
Pordage (chair Moonlight Robbery Campaign)
The Moonlight Robbery campaign, (www.moonlightrobbery.org.uk) is
supported by regional tenants’ organisations and TAROE.
(“Estimation of the need to spend on maintenance and management
in the Local Authority housing stock” by BRE Construction
Division published by ODPM June 2003. and “Self-financing
of local authority housing services: summary of findings of a modelling
exercise” published by CLG March 2008.) |